Thursday, 26 February 2009

RAGHAVAN, LTTE’s co-founder with Prabha, TELLS ALL


  • Prabhakaran inspired by Hitler…
  • Prabha started "Tamil new Tigers" with me…

In a revealing interview tracing the origins of Tamil nationalism and militancy, Ahilan Kadirgamar speaks to C Rajeshkumar alias Ragavan — a founder member of the LTTE — about the early years. Ragavan left the Tigers in 1984 and has since lived in exile in London. Ahilan, a contributor to Lakbimanews, offered this interview originally published on the web, for publication in this newspaper. Excerpts:

Did your family background have any impact on your affinity towards Tamil nationalism at that time?

The aim of my family, as with any other Jaffna Tamil middle class family, was to educate and make their children doctors or engineers. There was a production line mentality. At least one child, the elder child, should try and become a doctor, an engineer or, at the least, an accountant. Because of social limitations or a lack of resources, this was the only goal. A Tamil proverb says: "Kolzii meinthallum govermentil meikavendum". This means, "Even if you're going to have a chicken farm, you should do it for the government". That was the middle class aim which had become the Jaffna Tamil mentality. The family structure was headed by the authoritarian father figure whom you couldn't question. I wanted to leave the family as soon as possible. Even before I joined the LTTE, I wanted to leave the house. I even considered getting a job after I passed o/levels. I was inspired at the time by Tamil nationalist ideology and began to read papers like 'Suthanthiran' and 'Viduthalai'.

In your formative years, how did class and caste play out in your local community? Were you conscious of such issues at that time?

I was conscious of caste at an early age. My village, Punallaikatuvan, was divided into areas that didn't have a single identity. There was the north side and south side. Marriage customs differed and were restricted. In the early 60s, when I was around six or seven, my mother told me that a man called Thuraisingam — who was upper caste and a chandiyan (village thug) — had murdered someone long ago. He also owned land and the Dalits, the service caste, would work for him. There was a problem one day because the Dalits didn't want to work, as he hadn't paid them properly. Consequently, the entire Dalit community was chased away from my village. More recently, this was similar to the manner in which the northern Muslims were chased away. The chandiyan and his followers took away all the belongings of the Dalits. It was a long time before they could return and resettle. No one challenged that eviction and this had a lasting impact on me, although I was from a Vellala middle class family. In a sense, the Tamil nationalist ideology claimed that all Tamils should be united. We did not think about caste contradictions at the time and we felt that everyone should join the struggle irrespective of structural inequalities and caste hierarchy.

In the 70s, the government tried to implement existing legislation allowing equal access for Dalits to temples and public places. Temple entry in my village was out of the question. Nobody wanted to challenge the strength of the caste system. I remember going to a barber saloon (barbers belonged to the oppressed castes) when I was small, and asking the barber if he would allow Dalits into his saloon. There was a big muscular farmer standing next to me and he slapped me, because he was angry that I would even ask such a question. The barber saloon was soon closed down as the barber was scared of the upper castes. He started visiting people's houses and doing his work. The caste system was strong in the villages. With the service castes, there was no question of workers' rights. Whether or not you were paid, you had to work.

In the seventies, the village and caste identity were stronger than Tamil nationalist identity. I believe this to be still the case. In practice, cultural and religious festivals are caste orientated and the identity is preserved. Although there is, in a sense, a Tamil identity, it is the outer layer rather than the substance of the Tamil community. Social practices such as festivals, marriage and death are arranged according to the caste and village hierarchy. And although communist parties in the north talked about class during that period, there was no real working class formation and only a few factories, like the cement factory. I would say class was subsumed under caste. There may have been class divisions but there wasn't a strong consciousness of class whereas caste consciousness was strong. Without the elimination of the caste system, I believe that class unity is not possible.

How did Tamil political formations of the time, particularly the dominant role of the Federal Party, influence young people like you?

The Federal Party talked about Tamil nationalism but did not have an organized program. They did not even have a committee or village level organization. They would come every now and then and say, "This is our agenda". They didn't create democratic political space, because there was no political participation by the people. The Federal Party just made decisions at the top and passed them down. I often compare them with the DMK in India. While I don't agree with the DMK's politics, they have a strong, layered organizational structure and committees at village level. The Federal Party would, maybe, have one person in each village and the Federal Party MP will come and talk to him. A meeting would be arranged once in a blue moon. I am referring exclusively to Jaffna society. Therefore, we didn't have a democratic culture and there was the repressive character of the caste system, so the democratic mindset was also lacking. Everything from caste to the family was hierarchical in structure, designed in such a way that you must obey orders rather than discuss or criticize.

I believe the LTTE's political ideology reflected Jaffna Tamil, middle class and upper caste interests and pride, while its authoritarian structure stemmed from the hierarchical system of family and caste. We are now talking about the need for democratic culture but I would say we didn't have it then, either. There was electoral democracy but not a democratic culture. Grassroots civil society organizations did not exist. There were only state structures.

When did you become an active member of the LTTE?

Four people with the Maanavar Peravai escaped from the Anuradhapura prison during a jailbreak in 1974. One person from my village, who was involved with the Maanavar Peravai, hid one of them in our village. They knew we wanted to become active so they started speaking with us. I bought a pistol from a local thug and hid it. The police were not an issue for me… it was my father! I also started writing slogans on walls. A local saw me doing this one day so I ran away and stayed with my aunt for a couple of days because I was afraid that my father would beat me. I returned after learning that my family was looking for me. My father was the headmaster of a local school. One time, Education Minister Badiudeen Mahmud was visiting and all the schools were expected to welcome him. The night before his visit, a friend and I wrote slogans like "Badiudeen Mahmud Get Out!" Such activities were inspired by the TULF's idea of protest. More than opposing the state, we thought "traitors" should be eliminated first.

My first connection with the militants was when this person, Chetti, hid in our village. I started helping them. After they robbed a cooperative store, my role was to take them to safe houses. I would take them on my bicycle and provide them food and so on. I met (Velupillai) Prabhakaran through such connections. He, too, had belonged to the Maanavar Peravai and that's how I encountered him in 1974. He was talking about a separate state. I decided to support him.

The first organization Prabhakaran started was the Tamil New Tigers (TNT). The name was coined by Rasaratnam, a strong Tamil nationalist who had been with the TULF. Rasaratnam fled to India after Maanavar Peravai members were arrested and lived there until his death. The TULF was talking of federalism but I must say that the Suyaatchi Kazhaagam (V. Navaratnam's organization) always compared the Tamils with the Jews. 'Exodus' was translated into Tamil and 'Viduthalai' papers at the time always related the Tamil people to the Jewish people. "We are intelligent and they are intelligent. We are a small minority and they are a small minority. They do fasts and do not eat meat during fasting and we do the same. They were able to form a country of their own and we should do that." The Tamil identity is also mixed with Hindu or Saiva identity. Prabhakaran, Kuttimani and Thangathurai all took up this idea. Prabhakaran and Thangathurai were from the same village. But Thangathurai was not part of the TNT, because he thought Chetti, who was in our group, had been sent to a rehabilitation school for young people and was a thief.

There were so many factors and relationships at play. In my village, I would hardly ever see the army. Back then, the army was a symbolic force and not a fighting army. There were only a few thousand soldiers in the country. To my recollection, there were only 6000 armed forces personnel — army, navy and air force. But Velvettithurai was a smuggling village with an everyday army presence and there was always some tension between the army and the people. This is one reason why young people from Velvettithurai became active. Thangathurai was pro-US and pro-Israel. Prabhakaran was also of the same mindset but he was also, strangely, inspired by Hitler. He had with him a copy of 'Mein Kampf'. He also was inspired by Bhagat Singh and Subash Chandra Bose. It was a strange combination. On the one hand, I think he had ideas about Jewishness, the state and the formation of Israel. On the other hand, the idea of eliminating the "other" came from Hitler. There was a connection in his mind. The TNT was being formed in 1974 and I joined them soon after. But I didn't become a fulltime member until 1976. None of us were mature enough to understand what we were doing. Part of the problem was the TULF which did not have concrete plans to fight for federalism or for a separate nation. The TULF just used rhetoric to gain parliamentary seats. Consequently, young people inspired by the TULF ideology wanted to fill the gap and this became a very dangerous problem.

Iconic figures like Bhagat Singh and Hitler were outside figures. Were there any from the Tamil community who inspired the TNT?

No. Even the Tiger, the flag comes from the Chola kingdom… so it was always inspired by outside actors. All this is part of the mythology, particularly when we claim, that we were two nations before the British came. We were unable to even identify with someone like a king from that nation.

When did the interaction with India and Tamil Nadu begin? When did you first go to Tamil Nadu?

There was no direct interaction with India and Tamil Nadu. Still, even from the early seventies they would run to India to find a safe haven. It had nothing to do with the Indian state or politicians but was mainly through the smuggling links. They would stay with the Indian smugglers. I became "wanted" in 1976 and I went to India for the first time that year in a boat from Mannar arranged by Thangathurai. Back then, only a couple of local politicians were sympathetic towards us.

How did you become "wanted"? How did the police get to know about you?

On 27 July 1975, Alfred Duraiappa was killed. I was not aware that he was going to be killed. But after he was killed, Prabhakaran hid in my grandmother's house. I would stay with my grandmother, giving tuition to students as a cover to hide these people. When my father asked about them, I could tell him I was teaching them mathematics. The TULF would claim to support us but didn't even give us fifty rupees. I once cycled from my village (Punallaikatuvan) to Velvettithurai to collect ten rupees from a man because we did not have any money.

I was quite amazed by Prabhakaran at that time. He would hide in my grandmother's house. I would go to college and find him sitting in the same place, without moving, when I got back. In that sense, he was disciplined and extremely careful about his own safety. We didn't have money to buy weapons for the organization weapons so we robbed banks. In 1976, the Puttur bank was robbed.

Prabhakaran liked English not Tamil movies. He liked Western and war films. This was where he learned to plan the robberies and to kill traitors. He had a very good memory. If he met someone once, he would never forget that person. We were a small organization. He would give ten bullets to one person and twenty bullets to another person and will remember exactly how many bullets we had left. He was so organized.

After the Puttur bank was robbed, we started small farms with the money, cultivating onions and chillies. That was the cover for our training camps. The TNT then had about eight members and five of them were in the central committee — Prabhakaran, Aiyar, Pattanna, Kumarachelvam and I can't remember the fifth person. I was the youngest. A couple of others were also in the group, including Chellakili. One person who was part of the bank robbery was caught. He exposed my name and I became "wanted".

Thursday, 19 February 2009

Sri Lanka’s twin despair

Rajan Hoole and Kopalasingham Sritharan of the University Teachers for Human Rights (Jaffna).


The focus now is rightly on the civilians in the Vanni dying and being injured, caught between the LTTE’s determination to use them as a buffer and as corpses in statistics, and a government intent on crushing the Tigers with the free use of heavy weapons. The civilians have not been given a meaningful way out. The glass case behind which these helpless civilians were held and paraded as willing martyrs for the Tiger cause, with the connivance of an articulate expatriate lobby, is being shattered, more tragically now than in 1990 and 1995. It becomes all the more important to have in place an institutional mechanism to protect them.


The right way to deal with the problem was to place the primary onus on political means by meeting Tamil aspirations and exposing the Tigers. This has been tried only half-heartedly because of an extremist but vocal Sinhalese minority intent on crushing the Tamils as a political entity, habitually undermining every effort at a mildly federal settlement. They are now in control, with help from the LTTE and its provocations. The Tigers suppressed dissent with harsh repression holding that there should be no criticism of their means until Eelam is attained.


Likewise, Lankan defence spokesmen have branded critics of their often criminal actions as traitors who strengthen the LTTE. While President Rajapaksa tries to reassure the world by saying nice things, masked gunmen on motorcycles or in white vans who began targeting Tamils in 2006 have now become the dread of all Sinhalese who defer. Several journalists have been killed, attacked or have fled the country. The social, political and economic cost of ‘crushing the Tamils with numbers’ is being hid from the Sinhalese. Dissent still survives perilously.


One writer wrote, “Count the number of [disabled] Sinhala youth who are permanently limping around you…Count the number of young widows who are staring blank into the future, with a fatherless infant on her lap. Count the little children who are often used as ‘exhibits’, standing in rows for politicians to grin at them, the children of ‘war heroes’. [Observe] all those teenage village girls who frequent the Anuradhapura town for a living, waiting to be picked up by vacationing young soldiers.


” A senior left leader said recently, “[President] Mahinda uses this opium [of Sinhalese chauvinism] to drug the masses to forget hunger and misery…” A respected woman columnist warned of mounting repression, ‘The President sounded an ominous note in his Independence Day speech when he said, “We are today a nation that has defeated a powerful enemy (the LTTE) that stood before us. Similarly we should have the ability to defeat all internal enemies that are found in our midst’. That ‘internal enemy’ could be a political opponent, a journalist, a Christian priest…any citizen who questions the regime’s omnipotence.


’ This is the culmination of a history in which the State’s violence and obduracy in the face of legitimate Tamil demands for autonomy and security led to the Tamil militant response. The State tried to address this with violence and massacres killing, for a start, 7,000 Tamil civilians from 1983 to 1987, triggering the usurpation of the Tamil struggle by the LTTE for whom negotiation was anathema — a luxury whose terrible cost was imposed on a hapless people. The Sinhalese as a people have learnt much more than they are given credit for. Once the war ends the government would find it hard to sustain present levels of impunity and repression and many Sinhalese would want a fair political settlement for the Tamils.


Meanwhile the challenges before India are immediately to contribute towards the protection of Tamils in the Vanni and to a fair political settlement. Given that the LTTE decimated the Tamil leadership, India would have to ensure the emergence of a new Tamil leadership within a genuinely democratic process. In this regard India’s basic stand that it has no sympathy for the LTTE and at the same time the Tamil people are distinct from the LTTE, and should be protected at all times, is the correct one.


But in practice its actions that amount to seeking assurances from President Rajapaksa and promising aid for reconstruction, have no effect on the ground.


To all those who look to India to have a benign influence on the situation, it is important that she maintains its credibility.


Today many civilians are afraid to leave the LTTE area because of the government’s record in killing sympathisers and family members of the LTTE, and most civilians have, frequently conscripted, close kin in the LTTE. These are also persons being killed without ever having wanted to fight.


President Rajapaksa has after all formally invited Tamil Nadu leaders to come and an all-party delegation could do a great deal of good. Civilians would also have far greater protection if India plays its rightful role in lending its weight and personnel in international efforts to monitor and ensure that proper standards are observed with regard to civilians fleeing the LTTE.


It is India that could prevail upon the Sri Lankan government to return the displaced to their homes expeditiously and not hold them in camps for years to establish Sinhalese settlements on their lands. They are traumatised by their calamity and their future cannot be trusted to the present regime.


Those in Tamil Nadu who use the plight of the Sri Lankan Tamils for their narrow political ends, and blindly defend the LTTE, are inadvertently advancing the latter’s doom. Playing to emotions without engaging with the Sinhalese to work for concrete measures has been the bane of Tamil politics on both sides of the Palk Strait. This is a role that civil society and human rights activists in Tamil Nadu could take on by engaging with their counterparts in Sri Lanka, through seeking constructive means to defend the rights of all the communities in Sri Lanka.


Judging by newspaper columns there are Sinhalese opinion makers, who though not sympathetic to Tamil aspirations, do not want to see the Sinhalese branded as barbarians.


One suggested a week’s truce to allow the UN to go in, ascertain the plight of civilians and do what they can. Given such sensitivities, there is great scope for India in multilateral action. Every effort should be made to give the unwilling conscripts — prisoners — a chance.


Part of the paranoia in Sri Lanka results from a perception in defence circles that any foreign concern is designed to breathe new life into the LTTE. India and the leaders of Tamil Nadu have a clear position on this and could without any ambiguity make the distinction between defeating the LTTE and criminal actions against unarmed civilians by the state security apparatus, and see that the distinction is observed. That would help to ensure that the cause of democracy in Sri Lanka is not lost.

Source : The New Indian Express

Monday, 16 February 2009

எதிர்கால காய்நகர்த்தல்களுக்கு தயாராக....

பா.வி.சாந்தன் -

கருத்துத்தெரிவிக்கும் சூழல் பல நேரங்களில் மௌனத்தை தேர்ந்தெடுக்கிறது. மௌனத்தை நீண்டநாள் கடைப்பிடிப்பது சாத்தியமற்ற ஒரு விடயமே. இலங்கையிலும் உயிர்கள் செத்துமடிகின்றது. அதை செத்து மடிய வைக்கிறார்கள் தமிழர்களுக்கு விமோட்சம் தேடி 30 ஆண்டுகாலம்> சில உலக வரலாறுகளை யதார்த்த ரீதியாக மறுத்து ஆயுதத்தையே நம்பி போராடிய புலிகள் நம்பிக்கை அவர்களை தோற்கடித்ததன் மீதாகும். ஏதோ ஒரு வகையில் அரசாங்கம் களத்திலுள்ள புலிகளை குறுக்கி ஒரு குறுகிய வட்டத்துக்குள் கொண்டு வந்துவிட்டார்கள். அதை அப்படி உருவாக்குவதற்காக இலங்கை இராணுவப்படைகளின் நுட்பமான செயல் புலிகளின் பின்வாங்கும் நுட்பத்தில் மட்டுமல்ல அது ஆயுதத்தையும்> வன்முறையையும் நம்பி விமோட்சத்திற்கு இறங்கிய புலிகளின் நம்பிக்கை உடைவு.

அதேபோல்> அரசாங்கம் எத்தணிக்கின்ற இராணுவ ரீதியான தீர்வு இந்த மாதிரியான புலிகளோடு மட்டுமேயாக இருத்திக்கொண்டு> இனரீதியாக> பிராந்திய ரீதியாக> மொழி ரீதீயாக ஒடுக்கப்படுகின்றவர்களுக்கு அரசியல் ரீதியான விமோட்சனத்திற்கு வழிவகுத்துக்கொடுக்க வேண்டும். அந்த வழிவகுத்துக்கொடுக்கும் எண்ணப்பாட்டை சரி காலம் பிந்திய இன்றைய நேரத்திலாது தமிழர்களுக்கு> முஸ்லீம்களுக்கு> எல்லைப்புற சிங்களவர்களுக்கு கொடுக்க வேண்டும்.

வரட்டு சுயகௌரவத்தை தற்காத்துக்கொள்வதற்காக புலம்பெயர் நாடுகளில் புலிகளினால் கடந்த வருடங்களில் அனுப்பி வைக்கப்பட்டுள்ள கரும்புலிகளால் நடாத்தப்படுகின்ற தீக்குளிப்புகளாகட்டும்> மற்றும் கவனயீர்ப்பாகட்டும் சேகரித்த நிதியையும்> அதை சேகரித்த ஒழுக்கத்தையும் காப்பாற்றிக்கொள்வதற்காகவே நடாத்தப்படுகிறது. தமிழ் மக்களுக்கான அரசியல் தீர்வு கிடைக்க இருந்த சூழலை தட்டிக்கழித்துக்கொண்டு இன்றைக்கு அழிவின் விளிம்பில் பொதுமக்களை உயிர்கேடயங்களாக பாவிக்கும் புலியின் மீதும்> அதன் தலைவன் மீதும் புலம்பெயர்ந்தவர்கள் கொண்டுள்ள நம்பிக்கை வெளிறிப்போய் உள்ளது. இந்த வெளிறிப்போன இடைவெளியையே தளமாக வைத்துக்கொண்டு புலம்பெயர் புலிகள்> யுத்தத்தின் பின்னரான முழுச்சூழ்நிலைக்கும் பொறுப்பாளிகளாக இருப்பார்கள். அதாவது புலிகளிடம் சிக்கியிலுள்ள உயிர்களை காப்பாற்றிக்கொள்ளக்கூடிய சூழல் வந்தாலும்> பெரும்பாலான உயிர்கள் அழிவதும்> அழிக்கப்படுவதுமே புலம்பெயர் புலிகளின் திட்டம் மற்றும் அடுத்த கட்டத்திற்கான அடிகோலுமாகும்.

இந்தக்கட்டத்தின் பின்னரான சூழ்நிலையில் தமிழ் அரசியல் தாங்கிச்செல்வதற்கு ஜனநாயக தமிழ் அரசியல் தலைமைகள் தயாராக இருக்கின்றனவா என்ற கேள்வி நீண்டகாலமாக வெறிச்சுப்போய் கிடப்பதுபோல் கிடப்பில் போடமுடியாது. சாதாரணமாக வன்னியிலிருந்து அரைகுறை உயிருடனும்> அரைகுறை உடல்பாகங்களுடனும் மீண்டவர்கள் அதிகம்> எஞ்சிய அங்கத்தவர்களைக் கொண்டு குடும்ச்சுமையைதாங்கும் பெண்கள் அதிகம்> பெற்றோர்களையும்> பாதுகாவரையும் இழந்த சிறுவர்கள் அதிகம் மற்றும் புலிகளால் வன்மனமாக்கப்பட்ட பலவந்த ஆட்சேர்ப்புக்கும்> முன்னாள் உறுப்பினர்களும் அதிகம் இவ்வாறாள பிரிவு உறுப்பினர்களைக்கொண்ட ஒரு சமூகத்தின் அரசியல் தலைமைத்துவத்திற்கு தயாராக ஒரு தளம் உருவாக்கப்பட்டிருக்கிறதா? அது ஜனநாயக தமிழ்த்தேசிய கூட்டணியோ அல்லது மாற்று ஜனநாயகக் குழுக்களோ இதற்கு தயாராக இருக்கிறதா? அப்படியாயின் அவர்கள் தற்போதைய களச்சூழலில் இறங்கி செயற்பட்டுக்கொண்டிருக்கவேண்டும். ஆனால்> கிழக்கு மாகாணத்தில் உருவாக்கப்பட்டிருக்கின்ற மாஜி ஜனநாயக அரசியல் சூழலை ஒத்ததாக இருக்கக்கூடாது என்பது எதிர்காலத்தில் முகம்கொடுக்க பல சவால்களுக்கு உதவும்.

அதாவது தமிழ் மக்களுக்கான அதிகூடிய அரசியல் உரிமையைப் பெற்றுக்கொள்ளும் செயன்முறைகளுக்கு தடங்களாக இருக்கக்கூடாது என்பதே. முற்றுமுழுதான ஆயுதப்பாவனையற்ற ஒரு அரசியல்; எதிர்காலத்தை உருவாக்கும் பக்குவத்துடனே அரசாங்கத்துடன் பேரம்பேசும் செயற்பாடுகள் முன்னெடுக்கப்படவேண்டும். அதற்காக வடக்கை டக்ளசிடம் கொடுக்கவோ> கிழக்கை தொடர்ச்சியாக பிள்ளையானிடம் கொடுத்தோ நடாத்தப்படும் அரசியல் காய்நகர்ததலை ஏற்றுக்கொள்ளவது கடினமே. மாற்றுகருத்தாளர்களுடனான அரசியல் கலப்பு முன்னெடுப்புகளே ஆரோக்கியமான ஒரு சூழலை முன்னோக்கி உருவாக்கிச்செல்லும்.



source : theneeweb.de